Everything You Need to Know About Web 2.0 - 6 views
-
. On this page, you'll find articles on a variety of Web 2.0 tools and technologies. We'll continue to update this page, so be sure to check back to learn about the latest technologies for your organization. What is Web 2.0 Anyway?
Bloom's by Joshua Coupal on Prezi - 0 views
13 Free Web Annotation Tools for Teachers to Draw, Add Notes, and Highlight Sections on... - 0 views
POT Cert Week 19: promoting self-determination with web-enhanced teaching and learning ... - 0 views
-
Web 2.0 design supports a heutagogical approach by allowing learners to direct and determine their learning path and by enabling them to take an active rather than passive role in their individual learning experiences.
-
eLearning and Digital Cultures MOOC
-
gave learners access to resources on the open Web, and then for the final assessment, encouraged learners to submit a digital artefact created on a Web application of their choice.
cognitive presence | Instructional Design Fusions - 1 views
-
Web 2.0 tools
-
important impacts
-
Cognitive presence
- ...4 more annotations...
Mind on Fire - 0 views
Web 2.0 tool - 0 views
Cool Web 2.0 Tools! - LiveBinder - 0 views
-
Live Binders is an online 3-ring binder.
Education 3.0 and the Pedagogy (Andragogy, Heutagogy) of Mobile Learning | User Generat... - 0 views
Kaplan, Andreas - Users of the world, unite.pdf (application/pdf Object) - 0 views
-
Social presence is influenced by the intimacy (interpersonal vs.mediated) and immediacy (asynchronous vs. synchronous) of themedium, and can be expected to be lower for mediated (e.g., telephone conversation) than interpersonal (e.g., face-to-face discussion) and for asynchronous (e.g., e-mail) than synchronous (e.g., live chat) communications. The higher the social presence, the larger the social influence that the communication partners have on each other's behavior. Closely related to the idea of social presence is the concept of media richness. Media richness theory (Daft & Lengel, 1986) is based on the assumption that the goal of any communication is the resolution of ambiguity and the reduction of uncertainty. It states that media differ in the degree of richness they possess--that is, the amount of information they allow to be transmitted in a given time interval--and that therefore some media are more effective than others in resolving ambiguity and uncertainty. Applied to the context of Social Media, we assume that a first classification can be made based on the richness of the medium and the degree of social presence it allows. With respect to the social